Wednesday, June 19, 2013

Chapter 6

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Here King and Queen are lying dead
In great distress the soul is sped
 
 
Emerging from the dark interior of the Gale house, Dorothy and Toto enter a rainbow-colored, garden world. Surrounded by flowers of huge proportion, a speechless Dorothy takes in the wonder of hollyhock and bird of paradise reaching tall while lotus float in pooled waters.  She finally recovers enough to address Toto and make a simple statement of the obvious. Over the decades Dorothy’s seemingly trite statement has achieved chestnut-status. But the Kansas girl’s comment is not so much a cliché; instead, like an actual chestnut, her observation holds a glistening treasure inside a thorny burr.

           “Toto, I’ve a feeling we’re not in Kansas anymore” is now a classic phrase used beyond America’s borders. Spoken in later movies or in everyday conversation this statement needs no further explanation. An unknown territory replaces the familiar. No longer stable and unchangeable, life breaks open. Perception of the surrounding world as thorn-filled and painful dies. Underneath the thorny exterior resides a wondrous world, a world birthed into being through a radical shift in perception.

While the motif of death and rebirth provides a foundation in Eastern religions and teachings, similar teachings often took a back seat in the West. However, the idea of death leading to rebirth found a home in ancient Egypt and grounded the Greek/Roman Empire’s Eleusinian mysteries. The ancient philosophy continued in the Byzantine world. Through Arabic and Muslim influence, Western Europe rediscovered its roots and by the time of the Renaissance the pattern of death and rebirth became a keystone for European alchemy.

The caption accompanying the sixth Rosarium woodcut clearly refers to a death while the birth of a new creature dominates the accompanying image. Alchemy expert Adam McLean focuses on the image’s hermaphrodite as now a two-headed body replaces the two separate bodies depicted in previous woodcuts. The dual-crowned figure represents a “primal fusion” [1] as the masculine and feminine forces exchange energies. While other alchemical depictions show such a union as producing a third, separate being, the Rosarium depicts the hermaphrodite, indicating the process remains within the internal confines of the single seeker.

McLean provides an extensive commentary on the Rosarium text and his 4-tiered series of 20 woodcuts. And his extensive alchemy website offers colored-renderings of the original 16th century images. McLean’s coloration depicts the separate figures in woodcut 2 in red and white robes[2].  An 18th century Rosarium text notes this coloration as the alchemical journey progresses. “The red ferment hath married a white wife, and in their conjunction the wife being great with child, hath brought forth a son which in all things hath preserved his Parents, and is more bright and glorious.”[3]  The Rosarium imagery differs from the text, however, and depicts this newly-born creature is not a child but the hermaphrodite.

However, in McLean’s color-renderings, the one-bodied figure takes on a neutral skin tone, never fusing red and white to match the fusion of the inner process. Yet it is that very fusion that first seizes Dorothy’s attention upon entering her new-world. Coming in from right field, a huge pink ball stops before the astonished girl and morphs into a woman of regal bearing. Holding a star-capped scepter, the woman offers no introduction or greeting. However, she gives off a benign disposition as she attempts to clear up her own ‘muddled’ state and gently questions the equally confused girl.

The woman, garbed in a star-studded dress, finally shares her name and title – ‘Glinda, the witch of the North’. Despite the earlier fright from seeing a witch fly past her tornado-staged window, Dorothy now stands in utter amazement as she faces a beautiful witch. Dorothy’s new worldview is nurtured as her preconceived, provincial notion that only there are only ugly witches dies.

The death motif of Dorothy’s world-views and notions is as symbolic as that found in the famed Osiris myth or in the imagery of the Rosarium woodcuts. This death is not a definitive end. Unlike Plato’s myth of Er and the Eleusinian deaths, Jung believed this alchemical version, “is not death as a last judgment or other initiatory trial of strength; it is a journey of release, renunciation, and atonement.”  Furthermore, Jung believes this freedom-bearing death is “presided over and fostered by some spirit of compassion. This spirit is more often represented by a ‘mistress’ rather than a ‘master’”.[4]

Clearly star-studded Glinda represents Dorothy’s ‘mistress’ deserving of the small curtsy the girl offers her upon formal introduction. A compassionate Glinda patiently answers Dorothy’s questions and identifies her new surroundings. Calling out the Munchkins, the little people inhabiting Dorothy’s new world, Glinda then gently leads the displaced Kansas girl around a bridged-pool to a small dais.

Dorothy, however, feels a need to clarify Glinda’s interpretation of the girl’s arrival in Munchkinland and the miraculous killing of the ruling witch. Joining Glinda under a sunflower-umbrella, the Kansas girl recounts the events of the movie’s previous scene. Putting the tale to song, Dorothy leads a call and response tune as the Munchkins answer. Filled with rhymes, repetition and a simple melody, the catchy tune matches the movie’s simple dialogue in ease of remembrance.  

Song, like imagery, resides in the right hemisphere of the brain. In a simplified filing of brain activity, the right hemisphere is also most often linked with memory. Likewise repetition enhances memory.  Is there possibly more to these first few moments in Munchkinland than Dorothy’s introduction to a new world? Could all this memory-stimuli provide more than mere entertainment for movie-goers?

Memory has been the subject of philosophers since its earliest days. Plato presents two realms of memory through the teachings of Socrates. While Socrates berates the educational system of his day and accuses it of leaning too heavily on rote-memorization, he endorsed the development of an innate memory. Equating this inner trait with knowledge, it can be argued that Socrates referred to this memory-knowledge when uttering his famous dictum “Know thyself”. Full knowledge of one’s nature, however, comes at the end of a process and taps into a memory far beyond the conventional ability to recall facts, names and dates. Yet like all processes, the initial phase must first be tackled as ‘it’s always best to start at the beginning.’

Dorothy displays this early ability to remember as she sings her way through a detailing of her tornado episode. The Munchkin populace, content with Dorothy’s story as proof of her merit, present a small bouquet of flowers to the girl. Quickly burying her nose into the bouquet, the ‘national heroine’ takes the shortest of carriage rides. The carriage, pulled by two frisky ponies, stops before a seven-stair podium where trumpets herald the arrival of a small contingent of Munchkins.  

The befuddled heroine now faces Munchkinland dignitaries intent on verifying the validity of her story. Deciding whether the ruling witch of their land is “Morally, ethically/ Spiritually, physically/ Positively, absolutely/ Undeniably and reliably/ Dead!” the dignitaries rest with the coroner’s verdict. With the absolute confirmation of the witch’s death the Munchkins are proclaimed free.

Such emphasis on the death of the Munchkinland ruler reflects a similar significance found in the caption of the correlating Rosarium woodcut. Although some ambiguity may arise when viewing the Rosarium’s sixth image, the first line of the attached caption is clear - the separate king and queen are dead.  Yet in the caption’s next line, obscurity, the bread and butter of alchemy, once again reigns.

In a current-day interpretation of the caption’s second line, “In distress the soul is sped”, no concurrence to Dorothy’s story appears. Although confused by her sudden arrival in this wondrous land and equally befuddled by her rise in honor, Dorothy is far from being distressed or troubled. As for the soul being sped, where is that in accordance to Dorothy’s tale? How is the soul speeding along? Where is it speeding?

In the quest’s advice of starting at the beginning, sometimes a return to a word’s origin provides a reliable clue.  ‘Distress’ comes from the Latin districtus, meaning ‘divided in mind’ – a defining state in the early Rosarium depictions. And as the Rosarium captions hail from the 16th century, archaic definitions also lend clarity. The archaic sped implies “to prosper; to succeed”. So although the soul still retains a divided mind, it has succeeded in birthing a new creature, “more bright and glorious.”

As for Dorothy’s tale, in comparison to the inattention she received in Kansas, the young girl has indeed prospered in this new land. Ascending to national heroine status, Dorothy’s prospects for a rosy future flourishes. Prosperity, once the sole domain of Miss Gulch back in Kansas, is now presented to the girl.

Cheering and heralding their new liberator, Munchkins dance with joy. The camera focus spins away from Dorothy to follow the parade. Climbing stairs, the procession passes a huge nest filled with baby-clothed Munchkins. As the sleepy-eyed creatures stretch and yawn from their broken egg-shell encasements, the image of new birth strongly takes hold.

Along with new-born Munchkins, Dorothy’s new world includes another cross- cultural symbol of birth – the lotus. In both the perennial philosophies of ancient Egypt and Hindu religion, the lotus symbolizes reincarnation. Just as the simple flower shrinks at day’s closure only to re-open when the sun next rises, so is the human cycle of death and rebirth.

 Yet the Munchkinland pool holds three stages of the lotus - a single-flowered blossom, a pad of few petals and a large pad with hundreds of petals. Size of the lotus symbolizes spiritual progress in yet another strain of perennial philosophy. In Mahayana Buddhism a lotus bud implies potential, an eight-petal lotus suggests cosmic harmony and a thousand-petal lotus indicates spiritual illumination.

Although the Munchkinland pool holds all three sizes of the symbolic flower, translation of the correlating Rosarium image helps decipher which phase of the process this land represents. In Jung’s studies the initial appearance of a hermaphrodite figure did not indicate the process over but that it was just beginning. If Dorothy’s story correlates precisely with the Rosarium series, Munchkinland does not represent attainment of cosmic harmony or spiritual illumination but only the potential for evolutionary gains.

Unlike the previous Rosarium image the royal couple resides now in encased waters. A four-sided sepulcher replaces the six-sided version found in the series’ fourth woodcut. Although many theories can be formulated as to the sepulcher’s new design it appears that the conscious realm, that which produces boundaries, is once again present. The previously unbounded realm now sports a boundary to contain the dark Mercury. Whether this boundary change indicates a conscious realm stepping up and accepting the task of containing the strong urgings of the unconscious is debatable.

            Deciphering metaphorical imagery is an open-ended endeavor. Belonging to the realm of the unconscious, imagery found in alchemy, fairy tales and dreams is not to produce definite interpretations. Instead, these images are to stimulate memory. Imagery as a way of bringing forth deep memories is integral to this alchemical woodcut series. Considered to be a “meditative exercise”[5] contemplation of the Rosarium woodcuts creates a correlation with Church’s rosary meditation. Just as reciting the rosary calls for breaks in repetitive prayers with recollections of strong imagery from Jesus’s life, so contemplation of the Rosarium’s repetitive yet stark imagery can also bring forth benefits. Yet alchemy claims treasures can be found in contemplating not simply glaring imagery but also noting common details.

Perhaps lotus blossoms floating in a pool of pristine blue water simply presents film-making’s latest innovation, Technicolor. Perhaps increase in movie attendance, and not clue-dropping, is the motivational factor for such details. In the world of alchemy, however, images stimulate memory from the unconscious. Contemplation of minute details can bring a conscious encasement. The union of opposites is the goal of alchemy. Initially the unconscious and conscious realms stand in opposition. Yet the joining of the images of the unconscious with the encased- meanings from the conscious realm provides a fine starting point of this journey toward all-encompassing union.

Small details in conjunction with the overall storyline, whether found in a fairy tale or in life’s story, provide clues to the evolutionary journey. Details emerge with the retelling of favorite stories. A first-time viewing of Dorothy’s entry into her new world can be overwhelming. The appearance of a beautiful witch, small people hiding behind shrubbery and the bright Technicolor surroundings virtually demand a viewer focus on Dorothy in order to follow the plotline.  But with multiple viewings, with the plotline and songs memorized, more attention is given to details such as lotus floating in blue waters.

As Dorothy’s movie has been viewed more than six billion times, The Wizard of Oz has reached legendary status. The movie’s ballad, Over the Rainbow, was voted top song of the century in Time magazine as well as the Recording Industry Association of America.  Yet a myth cannot be influential if told only once. The story must be entertaining enough for the request of multiple retelling. Such is the case with the annual television broadcast of The Wizard of Oz over the past half century. With ubiquitous recognition to the story’s enchanted lands, fabled characters and popular song the episodic tale molds Dorothy into the quintessential 20th century heroine.

               Yet how influential is Dorothy’s story? How powerful is myth? The idea of myth is defined quite differently in different circles. To the 21st century layperson a myth is often simply an entertaining story with settings and situations based in non-reality. Its larger-than-life characters, especially, are considered purely fictional. Today’s Westerner, raised in a culture steeped in empirical science, believes only in the validity of non-fiction, filled with facts, statistics and dates. We are suspicious of false tales. Without a literal base, these larger-than-life stories are ‘false’ and therefore have no legitimacy, no importance. Only a child, like Dorothy, would believe a myth - just as the naïve girl believed the tale Professor Marvel gave her about Auntie Em.

Yet because of Professor Marvels’ tale Dorothy reversed her course of action and began to run back to the Gale farm. A sense of concern over her aunt’s ‘broken heart’ replaced the girl’s earlier sense of betrayal. Would Dorothy have reversed her plans if the professor provided only logical arguments endorsing the girl’s return to her Kansas farm? An embellishment of the facts, a tale added to a simple photo, changed Dorothy’s mind.

 According to those who view myth as an extremely important aspect of our lives the story is not only enduring but influential. Anthropologist, Claude Lévi- Strauss noted myths were stories “that operate in men’s minds without their being aware of the fact.” Filled with symbols and not deductions, a myth can go beyond the limitations of logic and move the listener in ways dry philosophies cannot. Myths present worlds full of potential, achieving unimagined heights and plunging untold depths. Image-filled myth comes closer to presenting a full mapping of the journey than the boxed- realms depicted in the limited maps of rational reasoning.

Rarely, however, do we have access to the original telling of a myth. After multiple retellings and translations many changes leave a fractured story. Future generations are left piecing the remaining parts together like a jigsaw puzzle.  Subject to corruption over time, the archaic is eliminated. Cross-culturally, details are revised to fit the new audience. The small details that once held importance are lost or replaced with insignificant additions.

Fortunately, Dorothy’s myth is in its first version. Even with forty minutes of the original 1939 movie lost to the cutting room floor, those interested in the piecing together clues find gems within the movie’s final presentation.  The creators of the movie classic pull out all stops and fill each frame with dozens of details – too numerous to bring each to light and find significant meaning. Besides, there is also the sheer enjoyment of the film to consider. But some viewers like a good mystery as well as a fine fairy tale and enjoy combining the two genres.

Over the decades, subsequent mythic movies fill their screens with abrupt imagery as the modern hero/ine seeks resolution. Yet many cinematic epics need more than one movie to encapsulate such a journey. Movie sequels often depict the hero/ine in firm control of their primary nature. Yet as they face their final challenges, great aid is provided by figures of the opposite sex representing matured secondary traits.

Dorothy, in her fully-encapsulated myth, has not been introduced, much less received aid from the representatives of her secondary nature. She has much to accomplish. Yet with the euphoria upon entering a new wondrous land complacency sometimes emerges. Why go any further in the journey?  Isn’t this new world perception enough?  

Yet the new perception, if not taken for granted but instead questioned, often leads to a newly-awakened state. Reflected in the Munchkin’s processional song-lyrics, “Wake-up you sleepy head,” clues emerge pointing to a newly-remembered awareness joining the newborn perception. How this awareness affects the mythical journey unfolds as Dorothy enters the next chapter of her Munchkinland experience.

 

 

 

 

 



[1] The Rosary of the Philosophers: Magnum Opus Hermetic Sourcebooks No. 6 Adam McLean 1981 p124

[2] http://www.alchemywebsite.com/rosary_thumbnails.html

[3] http://www.levity.com/alchemy/rosary2.html

[4] Jung – Man and His Symbols p152

[5] Rosarium Philosphorum p4

 

No comments:

Post a Comment