Thursday, June 20, 2013

Chapter 4


 
 
Once again we find Dorothy and Toto on the road. Carrying her suitcase, Dorothy crosses a small bridge that spans a gulch as the next scene opens. But an unusual wagon sits in the small ravine and intrigued she reads the words emblazoned on its side:

PROFESSOR

MARVEL

ACCLAIMED BY

The CROWNED HEADS OF EUROPE

The correlation between the wagon’s advertisement and the crowned figures found in the Rosarium is difficult to ignore. As with the previous image, this woodcut adds another element to the royal couple. The crowned-couple continue to hold mirror images as they offer their flowers with opposing hands. But now they have immersed partially into a hexagonal vessel. In his interpretation of the Rosarium series, Adam McLean asserts this image represents the beginning of the seeker’s 7-stage effort to attain alchemy’s first goal – the acquisition of the White Stone.

A similar initiation can be seen in Dorothy’s tale. Not only has Dorothy taken to the road once again but this time she carries basket as well as her suitcase. Smaller than the basket that temporarily held Toto prisoner, Dorothy’s container will, nevertheless, become a near-constant accessory as her journey progresses. While the basket Miss Gulch used may represent the Pali canon laws aimed at the good of the community, or sangha, Dorothy’s smaller basket could signify a different set of laws designed to help the individual.

At this point in the spiritual seeker’s journey it is likely that she is neither schooled in the philosophy or metaphysics of any spiritual discipline nor is she likely to be a rote-master of any teachings, Buddhist or otherwise. Buddha is not mentioned in the movie and it appears Dorothy’s basket, if it is to follow the Theravadic symbolism, must be applied to another line of perennial philosophy’s teachings.

While Christianity is noted in the previous scene, mention is made in this part of Dorothy’s journey of Egyptian ‘priests’. The bearer of this reference is a man Dorothy and Toto discover as they descend into the gulch. Dressed in fancy yet worn clothing, the stranger appears innocuous as he roasts his dinner over an open campfire. In order to uphold the claims painted on his wagon the man professes to read minds.  Guessing wrongly as to Dorothy’s mission, the amateur psychic finally deduces that she is running away. It is clear to the audience that no matter his artful claims, Professor Marvel is hardly a master at his craft.

But Dorothy gives him her full trust and follows after the charlatan as he invites her to enter his gypsy wagon. Inside, the center of focus is a crystal ball. The counterfeiter continues his theatrics, lighting a candle and placing a turban on his head. Maintaining the authenticity of the crystal ball, he presents the ball as being “…used by the Priests of Isis and Osiris in the days of the Pharaohs of Egypt.” [1]

While Buddhism is a great source of wisdom for perennial philosophy in the East, in the West the religion of ancient Egypt heads the list of contributors. The myth of its famed god and goddess, Osiris and Isis, is seen as one of the first hero journeys in recorded history. In the ancient myth, Osiris is killed by his younger brother Set, who tricks his brother into entering a sarcophagus that fits his frame perfectly. Seventy-two attendants rush in, “clamp the lid, wrap iron bands around it and throw it into the Nile”[2] The journey down the river Nile ends in Syria where a tree grows around the washed-ashore sarcophagus.

In the journey to find her deceased husband, Isis comes to the place in Syria where the tree has grown and is now used as a majestic pillar in the king’s palace. As Isis sits by a well within the palace, she is invited to nurse the newborn prince. Isis not only nurses the boy from her little finger but she also recites charms. As she lays him in the fireplace each night as a way to burn off his mortality she takes on the form of a swallow. One night the prince’s mother discovers this scene. Screaming when she sees her son in the fire, she breaks the spell and the goddess returns to her nursemaid form. Yet Isis explains her situation with such lucidity that the king releases her of wrongdoing and gives her the pillar that houses Osiris.

The importance of purifying fire in this ancient myth provides a link to this point in Dorothy’s journey. Warming his supper over an open fire, Professor Marvel is the only Kansas character connected with this central ingredient found in myth, religion and fairy tales. Yet fire is also central in the Rosarium text as it depicts the nature of the famed Philosopher’s Stone. The father of Western alchemy, Hermes Trismegistus, is given credit for the Rosarium quote, “Stone is fire…”[3] and fire continues to be used in key episodes that follow in Dorothy’s tale.

Although fire has purifying tendencies, those beginning the alchemical process are cautioned to start with a “soft fire.”[4]  Taking fire and using it only for utilitarian purposes, as Professor Marvel is doing, may be interpreted as symbolizing the alchemical soft fire. The Rosarium also credits Hermes’‘Fourth Book of Treatises’ and counsels that alchemists “repel the vice of arrogancy …[and] become virtuous and honest.”[5] Although he could represent alchemy’s keeper of the fire, Professor Marvel fails in upholding this important requirement of alchemy and its secrets.

The professor’s chicanery continues as he directs Dorothy to close her eyes. Following his direction with absolute trust, the girl fails to see the imposter rifle through her basket. Examining a photo that is soon replaced in its basket-home, the pseudo-fortuneteller asks Dorothy to open her eyes once again. As he simply relates objects he has just reviewed, the professor’s ability to accurately describe her Kansas home is a thing of wonder in Dorothy’s gullible perception.

Yet the same sense of wonder eludes her deceiver. Like Uncle Henry, Professor Marvel does not live up to his name. Life appears rather boring and predictable. But in enthusiastically asking Dorothy if she knows any crowned heads of Europe a different, a more childlike aspect of the charlatan emerges. One of the main characteristics of an alchemist, or anyone deliberately undertaking the journey of perennial philosophy, is an open mind and questioning spirit. The true alchemist searches the most mundane and commonplace in their world and discovers the wonder at its depth.

That Professor Marvel generally holds no sense of wonder is evident in his treatment of his campfire. The ‘gift of the gods’, fire is reduced to nothing more than a utilitarian purpose in the eyes of the pseudo-conjurer. The same holds true for the lowly draft-horse Professor Marvel addresses at scene’s end. But it is in the horse’s name, Sylvester, that esoteric possibilities can be seen as just out of reach.

Western perennial philosophy suffered a period of near-cessation during the centuries following the fall of the Roman Empire in fifth century AD. Yet Roman law also dealt harshly with the esoteric philosophy as it outlawed centuries-old Eleusinian Mystery initiations. These ceremonies, important for thousands of followers of Isis and the religious conviction of symbolic death and rebirth, became clandestine during the Empire’s final centuries while a rise of orthodox Christianity took hold during this same period. But even the teachings of Christian theologist Augustine, heavily influenced by neoplatonic philosophy, suffered when the Roman Empire fell to conquerors from northern Europe. 

Yet while the Western Roman Empire suffered a stunted period of cultural progress, the Eastern Empire continued to flower in arts, science and culture. The eastern Empire, also known as the Byzatine Empire, had its capital in Constantinople. In the ten centuries following the collapse of  the Western Roman Empire, the Byzantine gained, lost and regained northern Africa, Italy and western areas of the Mediterranean. Although given scarce credit by many non-historians, this empire would later become the all-important link between western Europe and its all-but-lost connection to the earlier wisdom of Greece and Egypt.

Before the crusades had obliterated Muslim communities, Arabic communities of the Byzantine empire sat next to their Christian neighbors in peace. Especially in Spain, the Arabic influence flourished and studies long dead in other parts of Europe found students from other lands eager to learn this new knowledge.

It was in the boundary area of Christian/Muslim influence that a poor young man from rural France began a dedicated education that would eventually lead him to the halls of Emperor Otto. Schooled early on in Barcelona in the shadow of Arabic learning institutions, the gifted Gerbert of Aurillac (c.940-1003) caught the attention of Emperor Otto I. Starting with the position of tutor to Otto II, Gerbert rose in rank and went to Reims in northern France to finish his education. As later instructor at the cathedral school Gerbert shared mathematics and other Arabic studies. By the year 999AD Archbishop Gerbert of Aurillac was made Pope Sylvester II, a post appointed him by Emperor Otto. Although pope for less than three years, Sylvester II, considered ‘the most learned man in Europe’[6] helped the Christian world started a new millennium.

 Excelling in little known studies, Gerbert taught the mathematics of harmonics in Reims and is credited later with helping to ‘introduce Arabic numerals to the West’.[7] With the attainment of remarkable knowledge in mathematics, Gerbert also excelled in astronomy. He is credited with writing a manual for the newly-introduced astrolabe, a contrivance allowing its’ user the rare ability to tell time from the position of stars and planets. Astronomy so enthralled Gerber that he spent a great deal of time and energy drawing models of the universe on horsehides. He would later use these models as barter to acquire rare manuscripts.

            Gerbert’s use of horsehide as canvas for his models of the universe is noteworthy as this drastic-utilitarian use of horses held the only means Gerbert had to increase ownership of important manuscripts. Yet it is highly unlikely that Professor Marvel would know the significance of horses in this pope’s life as Sylvester II, although highly-intelligent ,was not very influential in the papal line. However, his reputation during and immediately after his meteoric rise from rural poverty to pope led to speculations “that Arabian alchemists had taught him forbidden arts.” [8] Sylvester’s high intelligence and Arabic influence may have been strong contributions in the naming of the professor’s unassuming draft-horse. If the draft horse is to live up to achievements of the pope who shares his moniker, a much further process must take place.

In the Rosarium series, the process remains at its beginnings as the royal couple continue to proffer single-blossomed flowers in the fourth woodcut. But now the couple descends into a water-filled hexagonal vessel. McLean interprets this as “the realm of the unconscious” and points out that the vessel could be a repetition of the first woodcut’s “Mercurial Fountain”[9] The water of this process is given many attributes in the Rosarium text, most notably, “It is the water which killeth and reviveth. It is the water which burneth and maketh hot.”[10]  Whether mercury or water, immersion in liquid remains central in twelve of the next fourteen woodcuts and may indicate alchemy’s Mercury of the Soul to represent one of the most important ingredients of the journey.

There is no water to be found at this point in Dorothy’s story, simply a dried up gully. But water found in other stories often takes the form of a journey’s mode of transportation as in traveling the river Nile or Odysseus’ sea journey. Dorothy’s journey, however, is on a man-made road. Roads began replacing water travel in depicting the mythic journey even before the time of Chaucer. In land-locked Kansas travel along a road seems an obvious choice.      

Yet Dorothy is anything but certain she wants to continue her journey after receiving disturbing news from Professor Marvel’s crystal ball reading. After impressing the gullible Dorothy by underhanded means, the professor continues his wily ways and begins to weave a story using his crystal as a viewing chamber. A ‘careworn’ woman is described and Dorothy identifies her Auntie Em. The professor contrives that the woman is falling onto her bed after clutching her heart. No more is learned of Auntie Em’s health as the faker announces the crystal has darkened, leaving the rest of the story to Dorothy’s imagination.

Dorothy’s concern for the well-being of her beloved aunt overrides her desire to continue her journey to faraway places. This reversal could be seen as a correlation between Dorothy’s story and the partial submersion into the Rosarium vessel. While the following woodcuts depict the couple’s full submersion, the partial submersion found in woodcut four may represent hesitancy.  And indeed, at this point in an individual’s spiritual journey, the pull of familiar societal beliefs tugs just as strongly as curiosity of new and undiscovered lands.

The familiar realm for Dorothy was also familiar ground for much of the movie’s original viewing audience. The cultural norm of Christianity with its stabilizing commandments and its fundamental stance of belief in a savior providing the avenue of eternal salvation would appeal to many movie-goers in American theaters in 1939. Looking to a savior, whether an individual or a governing system, is typical of the earlier stance in the journey of looking outside oneself for stability and happiness. Perhaps at this wavering point the new journeyman believes the earlier betrayal that seemed so unacceptable can now be swallowed and a return to a predictable life would be the next best move.

Dorothy runs from the new world of the professor and his unfamiliar ways choosing to return to the familiar realm of Auntie Em. But before she crosses the bridge to retrace her road journey, she bends down and speaks to Toto. Summarizing her predicament, Dorothy reasons,  “Oh what’ll I do? If we go home, they’ll send you to the Sheriff. And if we don’t, Auntie Em may—well, she may die! I know what I’ll do—I’ll give you to Hunk. He’ll watch out for you.” 

This sound judgment by Dorothy is not found in the final released version of the 1939 film, the only film version available to its billions of viewers. These few seconds of edited dialogue accumulated as more and more of the film's original 140-minute version was cut away in the few weeks after the movie's first release. With more than forty minutes of the movie taken out, retrievable through scripts found on the Internet, one wonders why this entrancing movie suffered such drastic editing. Although a few theories have surfaced to answer this mystery perhaps the timing of the initial release provides the best answer.

Despite the tremendous pre-release hype Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer provided across the country, fewer people attended theaters during the last week of August, 1939 because more riveting news came through home radios. The world had been listening as to what Nazi Germany would do next in their push toward war. That week radios broadcasted the alarming news that Germany had invaded Poland. Lower attendance at the box office may have had nothing to do with audiences enjoying the film or not. But the film’s producers made decisions as if the quality of the film was the only factor.

What is lost in this scene as a result of drastic editing can be deemed quite important. Dorothy finds clarity as she makes the decision to return to her familiar surroundings. Leaving Toto with the farmhand, Hunk, seems quite sensible. Hunk provided sound advice earlier and may now be able to provide safe-keeping for Toto. Yet Dorothy is still taking a chance. Whether Toto remains safe with Hunk or is taken away by the Law, Dorothy is ready to relinquish ownership of her cherished dog.

And so it could be for the spiritual seeker during this first breaking away from the cultural norm of home. As Dorothy decides to return to her familiar home, so the seeker may also find this new process toward development too unsettling and choose to return to a more predictable realm. Although the Rosarium states that their process of development is “the universal way…easy and rare”, staying within the cultural limits offers less of a challenge at this point of the journey.

Dorothy is choosing what the alchemists describe “the second way” when she makes the decision to return to the Gale homestead. Alchemists see this particualr way as “very hard and laboursome.”[11] There remains an artificiality in the way of the cultural norm and alchemists see their art as “more natural.” Despite its universality, however, much care is made to conceal the secret of alchemy’s way. Whether it is buried beneath volumes of arcane symbolism or hidden within gibberish, such as spoken by Professor Marvel as he spins off about Cleopatra, Julius Caesar, and Marc Anthony, gold nuggets of wisdom can still be unearthed with a little patience and the eye or ear that takes nothing for granted.

            This is a fortunate age where edited film scripts can still be retrieved. The same retrievals can be found of once-lost books of many religions. Many view the lost-books as new pathways of spiritual development, rare but easy. However, the pull of the religion of birth may provide the seeker with a stronger desire to belong than to discover. But a destiny, beyond the particular yet artificial way, may decide the seeker’s future. And the wisdom found within a simple tale may give us the direction needed to put this new-found, yet ancient knowledge, to its best use.  

 

 



[1] Original Wizard of Oz script http://sfy.ru/?script=wizard_of_oz_1939

[2] Joseph Campbell Transformations of Myth Through Time p82

[3] The Rosary of the Philosophers p111

[4] Ibid p15

[5] Ibid p24

[6] James Hannam God’s Philosophers p25

[7] Ibid p28

[8] Ibid p30

[9] The Rosary of the Philosophers p123

[10] Ibid p15

[11] Ibid p11

Wednesday, June 19, 2013

Professor Marvel scene and deleted script


A quick link to the scene in The Wizard of Oz where Dorothy meets Professor Marvel might meet the need to refresh some folks' memories. The entire scene can be found at:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJaxd1BQr9g  

 

In placing the video side by side with the original, non-edited script of the 1939 movie, sharp eyes can find some rather interesting deleted notes.

http://sfy.ru/?script=wizard_of_oz_1939

 
* original posting 7/6/12

Chapter 5


 
 
O Luna, folded in my sweet embrace
Be you as strong as I, and fair of face.
 
 
One of the wonderful benefits of hiding alchemical messages within parables and fables is the inventiveness that ensues. Entertaining tales sweep us away while subliminally we might receive important messages.  And as we ask to have the same story told to us again and again because of its sheer enjoyment, the tale of how to break free of suffering-based ignorance etches ever-deeper into our psyche.

             The presentation of each Rosarium woodcut within different storylines adds to more than a cohesive map of the spiritual journey; it allows the imagination full sway to buffer difficult teachings through memorable images. How many ways can writers present the first full dive into the unconscious realm? How far down the rabbit hole can a reader stray and not lose sense of the story?

                Is it difficult to see the correlation between depictions of radical shifts found in common stories and the Rosarium’s fifth woodcut with the copulating king and queen fully immersed in liquid? After all diving into any bottomlesss liquid leaves a person confused, without a base of familiarity. Along with the stark imagery, the woodcut’s caption, beseeching the secondary realm become equal to the primary, also demands a thorough shift of the hero’s perception to begin.

                  A storyline depicting a person walking upside down in a zero-gravity environment appears to fit quite well in our acceptance of this stage of the archetypal journey.[1] Our collective psyche easily allows another story’s depiction of a chamber containing thousands of incubated human infants used as sources of energy.[2] Not only does the hero set off on an adventure but one of the most confusing parts of the journey appears at this early stage. In plunking their heroes in such radical environments and then squarely facing this upset, some writers of classic movies may replicate upheavals depicted 100 years earlier in literary classics.

                Imitation, in these cases, may not only indicate sincere flattery but could also denote a precise positioning within the archetypal journey. At this juncture the hero confronts a revolution in his fundamental world-view. Some stories quickly skip to this action-packed stage of the hero’s journey. Baum’s Dorothy enters her new world almost as quickly as Lewis Carroll’s Alice enters Wonderland. Some stories kick off with the upset and share preceding stages through recollections. Shakespeare chose such a technique in The Tempest, the tale of his last hero.

               When Dorothy’s 1939 movie is first viewed, her decision to return to the Gale farm provides no more deviation of her surroundings than in previous scenes. The Kansas landscape remains dull, sepia if not grey in color. However, the young heroine’s earlier decision to leave her place of belonging signals the mechanisms of destiny. Fate takes over and this depiction of Dorothy’s helpless confusion correlates with the Rosarium couple’s complete immersion into a liquid realm. While the alchemical imagery uses liquid to symbolize the unconscious realm, a powerful wind sweeps Dorothy to her new realm as the film’s creators take liberties with Baum’s ‘cyclone’ to give a new spin on a classic metaphor.

              Wind played an important part in directing the nautical course and ease for early sea-travelers along mythological journeys. Storytellers employed unleashed bags of wind and changes in prevailing air currents to depict how the gods, and not the hero, determines the next course of the journey. Even landlocked cultures with no knowledge of sailing ships, such as American Indians, used whirlwinds to portray Fate’s power.  And so, while Dorothy makes every concerted conscious effort to find security and take shelter in the farm’s root cellar, she fails. She now has no protection from the grip of the unconscious realm, represented by a frighteningly-large tornado.

               Dorothy’s tornado comes out of left field, literally. Each clip that forms the memorable scene portrays the huge twister bearing down on the Gale farm from the left of the screen. In classical representation the left indicates a sinister aspect. In the early Rosarium images the feminine, or secondary, figure proffers the flower with her left hand while masculine, or primary, figure uses his right hand to perform the same action. But with the fifth Rosarium image, the offering of bodies replaces the offering of flowers. And full submersion in the Mercurical world supplants the left hand as symbolizing the sinister aspect of the unknown realm.

              Alchemy-expert McLean focuses on the conjunction of the human figures found in the fifth image, describing it as the “inner union of the male and female forces of the soul,”[3]. But the obvious lack of containment found in this woodcut also demands primary interest. McLean interprets woodcuts 4-9 in the Rosarium series as stages leading to the attainment of “the White Stone, the inner mastery of the lunar force.”  Culminating in the Empress Stage of woodcut 10, the hermaphrodite figure displays the many gifts acquired during previous stages of inner work. However, while woodcuts in this integration process depict sepulchers, whether six-sided or four-sided, only woodcut 5 fails to provide a container for the conjugal couple.

             One interpretation of this noteworthy lack of containment could be seen as the heroine having no conscious control during this stage of the spiritual journey. Dorothy makes strenuous conscious effort to find safety as the threatening tornado looms toward the Gale farm. But when the killing wind finally hits, the house-bound girl falls into the grips of the unconscious as a sheared-off window frame strikes a hard blow to her head. With this head injury, the unconscious realm rules with Dorothy at its mercy.

               Although Baum’s Dorothy suffers no such injury, creators of the cinematic heroine draw upon a stock storytelling component for the journey’s continuation into unknown realms. As she reels from the window-frame’s blow, Dorothy lands on her bed, suggesting a sleep-motif. In placing their heroine in such a position, the film’s creators replicate earlier writer’s techniques. Both Baum’s Dorothy and Carroll’s Alice fall asleep before entering their respective new dream worlds. Yet Shakespeare’s final hero, Prospero, speaks of dreams occurring far beyond the realm of nocturnal sleep when stating “We are such stuff  As dreams are made on; and our little life Is rounded with a sleep.” [4] Whether presented as dreams enveloping an entire life or as sleep-induced visions or as an impairing head wound, the archetypal symbol of dreams, indicating the unconscious realm, remains strong.

                As previous authors dropped hints indicating how to best maneuver quickly in this stage so the screen-writers of Dorothy’s movie leave clues in their imagery. Baum’s original cyclone is now a funnel-shaped tornado. The shape and movement of the life-threatening force may be an indication where the next stage of the seeker’s journey leads. While cyclones come in a variety of shapes, tornadoes appear as long funnels. And a twisting long-necked shaft of destructive wind allows the movie’s creators to present yet another of the Buddhist symbols for the cause of suffering.

                  Buddhists explain the three major reasons for suffering as desire, anger and ignorance. The Tibetan Buddhist symbol for ignorance is the pig and Dorothy has already escaped one encounter with porcine family members, Duroc hogs. Further Buddhist symbolism includes a rooster representing desire while a snake denotes anger. A life-threatening snake showing up in the Kansas plains presented the need for creative imagery for the1939 movie screenwriters.

                  The movie’s special effects crew faced a similar challenge in constructing a snake-like image able to sweep up buildings in its tornado-pathway. Yet the problem was solved using ladies’ hosiery. The resulting image gives the impression of a swaying snake, a weaving cobra as it emerges from a charmer’s basket. Just as audience members’ eyes lock helplessly in the cobra’s hypnotic gaze so Dorothy also seems powerless in this stage.

             Yet in a deleted portion of this scene, Dorothy’s representative of her secondary realm, Uncle Henry, takes charge. Crossing the line from urgency to anger Dorothy’s uncle yells “Doggone it, Hickory” as he directs the farmhand to stop his workings with a wind-controlling machine. The more pressing need of setting horses free from the barn weighs on the farm-owner’s mind. In following the Rosarium storyline, Uncle Henry’s reversal from meekness to anger may indicate the best action for a seeker at this juncture of their life’s journey.

                 A reader of this deleted script, with the curiosity of an alchemist, would question these three symbols – the wind-machine, the horses and the snake-like tornado. Symbols and metaphors are the life-blood for the alchemist. Not only do they provide the means to hide valuable information but promote the open-minded questioning of the perennial philosopher. Fables and parables, the Rosarium’s favored means of hiding esoteric information, depend on metaphors. If read or viewed in only a literal sense, the story’s hidden meanings remain untapped.

           Arguably Baum used Eastern symbolism in his original tale. Yet the turn-of-the-century author may have had misgivings in using blatant symbolism. But as Baum first introduced his Kansas heroine to readers, another young Indian hero made his debut, surrounded by Eastern symbolism. Following the immense popularity of Rudyard Kipling’s Kim, Dorothy’s cinematic creators may have felt their Western audience primed and ready to take on new, yet ancient, symbols in their tale of adventure.

            Although best known presently for his Jungle Book series, while living, Kipling’s most popular children’s story was Kim. Set in India, like many of Kipling’s stories, the story centers on a street urchin who befriends, not a Hindu saint or holy man, but a traveling Buddhist abbot.  The devout pilgrim from Tibet does not know his way around India yet intends to take in many of the historical sites connected with Buddha’s life and travels. Kim’s street-savvy aids the old man and in return the presence and teachings of a spiritual master bless the young Indian boy.

               High-ranking in the Masonic Order, Kipling knew the importance of symbolism. And as a Nobel prize-winner novelist Kipling adhered to the literary convention of not presenting the teachings of the abbot outright. In weaving a story around Kim and his adventures Kipling left no overt directives but instead inserted clues geared to help the spiritual work of astute readers.

               The popularity of Kipling’s works and his heavy use of eastern symbolism may have encouraged Dorothy’s cinematic creators to take the same approach nearly forty years later. In those intervening decades a World War and a Depression, each deserving of their capitalized designations, brought about a collective maturity to an otherwise adolescent America. And now another large scale war loomed. Perhaps believing their audience primed for a hard-hitting message, Dorothy’s film-creators leaned heavily on archetypal imagery from Eastern and esoteric Western teachings to present the perennial philosophy behind the children’s story.

             Yet there are dangers in using symbols and metaphors. Interpretations vary with the cultural upbringing of readers and viewers. Even an extremely popular author like Kipling had to bow to a shift in cultural interpretation when the Hindu swastika symbol he used to denote good luck in the printings of his books, needed now to be removed as the same symbol was adopted by Nazi Germany.

              Another problem in using symbolism to address a message in a story is the prejudicial foundation of the reader. The symbolism in Baum’s book led early readers to interpret Dorothy’s creator used her story to make statements against the political system in turn-of-the-century America. This interpretation gained such credibility as to lead to theater renditions of Baum’s book peppered with political jibes.

                The same tendency to set Dorothy’s story into the realm of American politics took hold when viewers of the 1939 movie saw it as accusatory commentary against socialist-leaning policies of the New-Deal. And still other interpretations of the film were based in such diverse camps as it being Hollywood’s hit against Nazi Germany as well as a later interpretive endorsement of gay/lesbian lifestyles.

               A recent series of spiritual interpretations of The Wizard of Oz [5] not only provides weight endorsing such a viewpoint but also addresses a prominent perspective of this new century. Book publishers, in the business to make money, increase the marketing in this field of spiritual viewpoints, applying it to published works on spirituality affecting relationships, business, sports and financial success. Bookstores handle this influx of spiritual writings by sporting entire sections devoted to New Age and other writings influenced by Eastern philosophies and teachings.

             That there should be a rise in spiritual interpretations of Dorothy’s story should not be surprising. Yet there are as many versions of The Wizard of Oz as there are viewers. Each person brings with them a unique perspective as they watch Dorothy’s story unfold. The same person can bring yet another radically altered perspective when watching this children’s classic decades later with their own children nearby. What gives credibility, however, to a spiritual-mapping of the symbolism found in this near-mythic movie is not only arguable imagery but also the prevalence of newly-introduced Eastern teachings finding homes in Hollywood’s early years.  

                   In the previous century ambassadors from spiritual India came to America and other Western nations. Finding eager audiences in New York, some teachers traveled west sharing their foreign philosophies across the country. Yet the climate of southern California agreed most favorably with the Indian masters. In the two decades previous to the filming of Dorothy’s 1939 story meditation centers, religious communities and national headquarters for Hindu orders found homes in Hollywood and surrounding areas. While the average American may not have recognized Eastern symbolism in Dorothy’s cinematic tale, Hollywood writers may have found jumping on the bandwagon of Eastern influence hard to resist.          

               Some semblance of constancy must be maintained, however, in interpreting symbols to help clarify the journey’s map. If the map’s key includes the symbol of a snake and the map-reader is familiar with only orthodox symbolism of the snake found in Western religions, great confusion might ensue. In Dorothy’s story, the snake-shaped tornado may represent a force far beyond the reach of the young girl’s present conscious development. And yet this force is vital to the continuation of her story. If the tornado does indeed represent a snake, a question arises. To paraphrase one of the movie’s more memorable lines a person might ask “is it a good snake or a bad snake?’

            In orthodox view of Auntie Em’s Christian stance, anger, if indeed represented by a snake, is to be repressed. In certain orthodox imagery, holy figures step on a snake to depict such a viewpoint. The orthodox view also cleaves to the Genesis story wherein a serpent represents the capital deceiver in Adam and Eve’s story of expulsion from their paradise home. The orthodox belief in the West maintains that without the serpent and all it symbolized, humanity would never have suffered a continuance of this banishment.

                 To return to this paradise, the orthodox view is to subdue the snake and all it symbolizes. In Auntie Em’s view ‘a good Christian woman’ must repress her anger .  Unleashed anger is socially unacceptable and would strike against the laws issued for the good of the community. To Dorothy’s provincial aunt, as to most of the movie’s initial audience of church-going American Christians, it would ‘go against the law’ to assert such anger.

                However, interpretations of a snake’s image varies greatly throughout the world’s religions, cultures and mythologies. As Joseph Campbell noted, “The usual mythologolical (sic) association of the serpent is not, as in the Bible, with corruption, but with physical and spiritual health, as in the Greek caduceus.”[6] While a coiled snake can denote the Western symbol of physical healing, the caduceus, its coiling the staff of Mercury can denote further healing. McLean likens the first woodcut’s fountain “Mercurial” and feels the “watery vessel [is]… the inner ever flowing Mercury of the soul”. Mercury’s staff is incomplete without a snake curling around it. As such, interpretation of the coiled snake as a beneficial ingredient of spiritual transformation gains validity.

                Interpretation of any symbol is a tricky endeavor, especially in alchemy. The snake depicted in the Rosarium’s woodcut 10 curls around the hermaphrodite’s left arm. Encircling the left arm, we can surmise that the snake symbolizes something unorthodox, or “sinister”. Yet the coiling motif signals good health.  As in the caption found beneath the Rosarium’s first woodcut states, its mysterious helpful aid is, also, “full of poisons”.  Of the many possible interpretations for what a poison-filled snake could symbolize, anger as both detrimental and beneficial seems as plausible an interpretation as any other.

              In the caption of the Rosarium’s fifth woodcut Sol addresses Luna, calling forth strength and might from the secondary realm. In the quick snippets of the Gale farm before the tornado hits, an astute viewer notes that Uncle Henry, representative of Dorothy’s secondary realm, begins to live up to his given name and shows signs of truly being ‘ruler of the house’. Yet while Uncle Henry takes charge before the gale-force winds fully descend on the Kansas farm, the Mercurial realm, or the realm of the unconscious, takes over once the tornado hits. The head-injured Dorothy wakes to an unreal world of the Mercurial realm where the unconscious directs the dream. Unless trained in the discipline of lucid dreaming, the average person loses all sense of conscious control upon entering Mercury’s domain.

             The movie’s creators use their particular version of violent winds to introduce Dorothy’s dream. And though tornadoes can easily lift houses off foundations, tear trees from the ground and toss smaller items miles away, this tornado provides strange visions as well. When Dorothy wakes from receiving her nasty window-frame blow, the amazed girl finds a variety of people, animals, trees and furniture flying past her bedroom view. Mythical interpretation of these images would take up an entire book of explanations and seems better left to personal investigations.

          Yet stage direction provides anomalies in this dream sequence. In this movie’s original script, two cows fly separately past the bedroom’s opening. Yet in both cases stage direction has Toto darting under the bed. An inquiring mind wonders what these cows represent that would elicit such a fear-filled response in the otherwise fearless dog.  Does this out-of-the-ordinary response provide a clue as to a way out of the disturbing, groundless stage and into more stability? 

           Dorothy’s tornado experience ends with a vision that causes the girl to finally go beyond wonder and into fright. Almira Gulch, riding her bicycle past the window, morphs into a vision of a witch wearing a robe and pointed hat. Her bicycle also changes, turning into a broomstick that the cackling witch easily maneuvers.  As the figure flies near the opening Dorothy covers her eyes. And as the house spins apart from the tornado and descends rapidly Dorothy screams many times, holding her beloved Toto close.

           There is safety to be found by the end of this stage, however. In the movie, its’ creators interpret this stage of the spiritual journey ending harmlessly even as the whirling house crashes to the ground. Unlike the house, its inhabitants remain unharmed as they are cushioned by the bed where they lay. A dream-like trust takes over as Dorothy picks up her ever-present basket, opens the front door, and leaves the frightening episode behind. Yet also left behind is her familiar world. She cannot return the way she came. And so fate forces the young traveler to journey further.

 





[1] 2001 A Space Odyssey

[2] Matrix

[3] The Rosary of the Philosophers p124

[4] William Shakespeare The Tempest Act IV, scene i

[5] The Zen of Oz; The Wizard of Oz as a Spiritual Journey

[6] Campbell’s Mythic Image p286

twister scene video


Another memorable scene worth watching again, The Wizard of Oz 'twister' episode (as well as the end of the previous scene) can be best found on  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C1PfVVFq97I-

As for all the symbolism found in this scene, this movie and the many stories that shape our lives, it helps to remember the following:

"The human mind is like an umbrella; it functions best when open."

Walter Gropius
 

Chapter 6

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Here King and Queen are lying dead
In great distress the soul is sped
 
 
Emerging from the dark interior of the Gale house, Dorothy and Toto enter a rainbow-colored, garden world. Surrounded by flowers of huge proportion, a speechless Dorothy takes in the wonder of hollyhock and bird of paradise reaching tall while lotus float in pooled waters.  She finally recovers enough to address Toto and make a simple statement of the obvious. Over the decades Dorothy’s seemingly trite statement has achieved chestnut-status. But the Kansas girl’s comment is not so much a cliché; instead, like an actual chestnut, her observation holds a glistening treasure inside a thorny burr.

           “Toto, I’ve a feeling we’re not in Kansas anymore” is now a classic phrase used beyond America’s borders. Spoken in later movies or in everyday conversation this statement needs no further explanation. An unknown territory replaces the familiar. No longer stable and unchangeable, life breaks open. Perception of the surrounding world as thorn-filled and painful dies. Underneath the thorny exterior resides a wondrous world, a world birthed into being through a radical shift in perception.

While the motif of death and rebirth provides a foundation in Eastern religions and teachings, similar teachings often took a back seat in the West. However, the idea of death leading to rebirth found a home in ancient Egypt and grounded the Greek/Roman Empire’s Eleusinian mysteries. The ancient philosophy continued in the Byzantine world. Through Arabic and Muslim influence, Western Europe rediscovered its roots and by the time of the Renaissance the pattern of death and rebirth became a keystone for European alchemy.

The caption accompanying the sixth Rosarium woodcut clearly refers to a death while the birth of a new creature dominates the accompanying image. Alchemy expert Adam McLean focuses on the image’s hermaphrodite as now a two-headed body replaces the two separate bodies depicted in previous woodcuts. The dual-crowned figure represents a “primal fusion” [1] as the masculine and feminine forces exchange energies. While other alchemical depictions show such a union as producing a third, separate being, the Rosarium depicts the hermaphrodite, indicating the process remains within the internal confines of the single seeker.

McLean provides an extensive commentary on the Rosarium text and his 4-tiered series of 20 woodcuts. And his extensive alchemy website offers colored-renderings of the original 16th century images. McLean’s coloration depicts the separate figures in woodcut 2 in red and white robes[2].  An 18th century Rosarium text notes this coloration as the alchemical journey progresses. “The red ferment hath married a white wife, and in their conjunction the wife being great with child, hath brought forth a son which in all things hath preserved his Parents, and is more bright and glorious.”[3]  The Rosarium imagery differs from the text, however, and depicts this newly-born creature is not a child but the hermaphrodite.

However, in McLean’s color-renderings, the one-bodied figure takes on a neutral skin tone, never fusing red and white to match the fusion of the inner process. Yet it is that very fusion that first seizes Dorothy’s attention upon entering her new-world. Coming in from right field, a huge pink ball stops before the astonished girl and morphs into a woman of regal bearing. Holding a star-capped scepter, the woman offers no introduction or greeting. However, she gives off a benign disposition as she attempts to clear up her own ‘muddled’ state and gently questions the equally confused girl.

The woman, garbed in a star-studded dress, finally shares her name and title – ‘Glinda, the witch of the North’. Despite the earlier fright from seeing a witch fly past her tornado-staged window, Dorothy now stands in utter amazement as she faces a beautiful witch. Dorothy’s new worldview is nurtured as her preconceived, provincial notion that only there are only ugly witches dies.

The death motif of Dorothy’s world-views and notions is as symbolic as that found in the famed Osiris myth or in the imagery of the Rosarium woodcuts. This death is not a definitive end. Unlike Plato’s myth of Er and the Eleusinian deaths, Jung believed this alchemical version, “is not death as a last judgment or other initiatory trial of strength; it is a journey of release, renunciation, and atonement.”  Furthermore, Jung believes this freedom-bearing death is “presided over and fostered by some spirit of compassion. This spirit is more often represented by a ‘mistress’ rather than a ‘master’”.[4]

Clearly star-studded Glinda represents Dorothy’s ‘mistress’ deserving of the small curtsy the girl offers her upon formal introduction. A compassionate Glinda patiently answers Dorothy’s questions and identifies her new surroundings. Calling out the Munchkins, the little people inhabiting Dorothy’s new world, Glinda then gently leads the displaced Kansas girl around a bridged-pool to a small dais.

Dorothy, however, feels a need to clarify Glinda’s interpretation of the girl’s arrival in Munchkinland and the miraculous killing of the ruling witch. Joining Glinda under a sunflower-umbrella, the Kansas girl recounts the events of the movie’s previous scene. Putting the tale to song, Dorothy leads a call and response tune as the Munchkins answer. Filled with rhymes, repetition and a simple melody, the catchy tune matches the movie’s simple dialogue in ease of remembrance.  

Song, like imagery, resides in the right hemisphere of the brain. In a simplified filing of brain activity, the right hemisphere is also most often linked with memory. Likewise repetition enhances memory.  Is there possibly more to these first few moments in Munchkinland than Dorothy’s introduction to a new world? Could all this memory-stimuli provide more than mere entertainment for movie-goers?

Memory has been the subject of philosophers since its earliest days. Plato presents two realms of memory through the teachings of Socrates. While Socrates berates the educational system of his day and accuses it of leaning too heavily on rote-memorization, he endorsed the development of an innate memory. Equating this inner trait with knowledge, it can be argued that Socrates referred to this memory-knowledge when uttering his famous dictum “Know thyself”. Full knowledge of one’s nature, however, comes at the end of a process and taps into a memory far beyond the conventional ability to recall facts, names and dates. Yet like all processes, the initial phase must first be tackled as ‘it’s always best to start at the beginning.’

Dorothy displays this early ability to remember as she sings her way through a detailing of her tornado episode. The Munchkin populace, content with Dorothy’s story as proof of her merit, present a small bouquet of flowers to the girl. Quickly burying her nose into the bouquet, the ‘national heroine’ takes the shortest of carriage rides. The carriage, pulled by two frisky ponies, stops before a seven-stair podium where trumpets herald the arrival of a small contingent of Munchkins.  

The befuddled heroine now faces Munchkinland dignitaries intent on verifying the validity of her story. Deciding whether the ruling witch of their land is “Morally, ethically/ Spiritually, physically/ Positively, absolutely/ Undeniably and reliably/ Dead!” the dignitaries rest with the coroner’s verdict. With the absolute confirmation of the witch’s death the Munchkins are proclaimed free.

Such emphasis on the death of the Munchkinland ruler reflects a similar significance found in the caption of the correlating Rosarium woodcut. Although some ambiguity may arise when viewing the Rosarium’s sixth image, the first line of the attached caption is clear - the separate king and queen are dead.  Yet in the caption’s next line, obscurity, the bread and butter of alchemy, once again reigns.

In a current-day interpretation of the caption’s second line, “In distress the soul is sped”, no concurrence to Dorothy’s story appears. Although confused by her sudden arrival in this wondrous land and equally befuddled by her rise in honor, Dorothy is far from being distressed or troubled. As for the soul being sped, where is that in accordance to Dorothy’s tale? How is the soul speeding along? Where is it speeding?

In the quest’s advice of starting at the beginning, sometimes a return to a word’s origin provides a reliable clue.  ‘Distress’ comes from the Latin districtus, meaning ‘divided in mind’ – a defining state in the early Rosarium depictions. And as the Rosarium captions hail from the 16th century, archaic definitions also lend clarity. The archaic sped implies “to prosper; to succeed”. So although the soul still retains a divided mind, it has succeeded in birthing a new creature, “more bright and glorious.”

As for Dorothy’s tale, in comparison to the inattention she received in Kansas, the young girl has indeed prospered in this new land. Ascending to national heroine status, Dorothy’s prospects for a rosy future flourishes. Prosperity, once the sole domain of Miss Gulch back in Kansas, is now presented to the girl.

Cheering and heralding their new liberator, Munchkins dance with joy. The camera focus spins away from Dorothy to follow the parade. Climbing stairs, the procession passes a huge nest filled with baby-clothed Munchkins. As the sleepy-eyed creatures stretch and yawn from their broken egg-shell encasements, the image of new birth strongly takes hold.

Along with new-born Munchkins, Dorothy’s new world includes another cross- cultural symbol of birth – the lotus. In both the perennial philosophies of ancient Egypt and Hindu religion, the lotus symbolizes reincarnation. Just as the simple flower shrinks at day’s closure only to re-open when the sun next rises, so is the human cycle of death and rebirth.

 Yet the Munchkinland pool holds three stages of the lotus - a single-flowered blossom, a pad of few petals and a large pad with hundreds of petals. Size of the lotus symbolizes spiritual progress in yet another strain of perennial philosophy. In Mahayana Buddhism a lotus bud implies potential, an eight-petal lotus suggests cosmic harmony and a thousand-petal lotus indicates spiritual illumination.

Although the Munchkinland pool holds all three sizes of the symbolic flower, translation of the correlating Rosarium image helps decipher which phase of the process this land represents. In Jung’s studies the initial appearance of a hermaphrodite figure did not indicate the process over but that it was just beginning. If Dorothy’s story correlates precisely with the Rosarium series, Munchkinland does not represent attainment of cosmic harmony or spiritual illumination but only the potential for evolutionary gains.

Unlike the previous Rosarium image the royal couple resides now in encased waters. A four-sided sepulcher replaces the six-sided version found in the series’ fourth woodcut. Although many theories can be formulated as to the sepulcher’s new design it appears that the conscious realm, that which produces boundaries, is once again present. The previously unbounded realm now sports a boundary to contain the dark Mercury. Whether this boundary change indicates a conscious realm stepping up and accepting the task of containing the strong urgings of the unconscious is debatable.

            Deciphering metaphorical imagery is an open-ended endeavor. Belonging to the realm of the unconscious, imagery found in alchemy, fairy tales and dreams is not to produce definite interpretations. Instead, these images are to stimulate memory. Imagery as a way of bringing forth deep memories is integral to this alchemical woodcut series. Considered to be a “meditative exercise”[5] contemplation of the Rosarium woodcuts creates a correlation with Church’s rosary meditation. Just as reciting the rosary calls for breaks in repetitive prayers with recollections of strong imagery from Jesus’s life, so contemplation of the Rosarium’s repetitive yet stark imagery can also bring forth benefits. Yet alchemy claims treasures can be found in contemplating not simply glaring imagery but also noting common details.

Perhaps lotus blossoms floating in a pool of pristine blue water simply presents film-making’s latest innovation, Technicolor. Perhaps increase in movie attendance, and not clue-dropping, is the motivational factor for such details. In the world of alchemy, however, images stimulate memory from the unconscious. Contemplation of minute details can bring a conscious encasement. The union of opposites is the goal of alchemy. Initially the unconscious and conscious realms stand in opposition. Yet the joining of the images of the unconscious with the encased- meanings from the conscious realm provides a fine starting point of this journey toward all-encompassing union.

Small details in conjunction with the overall storyline, whether found in a fairy tale or in life’s story, provide clues to the evolutionary journey. Details emerge with the retelling of favorite stories. A first-time viewing of Dorothy’s entry into her new world can be overwhelming. The appearance of a beautiful witch, small people hiding behind shrubbery and the bright Technicolor surroundings virtually demand a viewer focus on Dorothy in order to follow the plotline.  But with multiple viewings, with the plotline and songs memorized, more attention is given to details such as lotus floating in blue waters.

As Dorothy’s movie has been viewed more than six billion times, The Wizard of Oz has reached legendary status. The movie’s ballad, Over the Rainbow, was voted top song of the century in Time magazine as well as the Recording Industry Association of America.  Yet a myth cannot be influential if told only once. The story must be entertaining enough for the request of multiple retelling. Such is the case with the annual television broadcast of The Wizard of Oz over the past half century. With ubiquitous recognition to the story’s enchanted lands, fabled characters and popular song the episodic tale molds Dorothy into the quintessential 20th century heroine.

               Yet how influential is Dorothy’s story? How powerful is myth? The idea of myth is defined quite differently in different circles. To the 21st century layperson a myth is often simply an entertaining story with settings and situations based in non-reality. Its larger-than-life characters, especially, are considered purely fictional. Today’s Westerner, raised in a culture steeped in empirical science, believes only in the validity of non-fiction, filled with facts, statistics and dates. We are suspicious of false tales. Without a literal base, these larger-than-life stories are ‘false’ and therefore have no legitimacy, no importance. Only a child, like Dorothy, would believe a myth - just as the naïve girl believed the tale Professor Marvel gave her about Auntie Em.

Yet because of Professor Marvels’ tale Dorothy reversed her course of action and began to run back to the Gale farm. A sense of concern over her aunt’s ‘broken heart’ replaced the girl’s earlier sense of betrayal. Would Dorothy have reversed her plans if the professor provided only logical arguments endorsing the girl’s return to her Kansas farm? An embellishment of the facts, a tale added to a simple photo, changed Dorothy’s mind.

 According to those who view myth as an extremely important aspect of our lives the story is not only enduring but influential. Anthropologist, Claude Lévi- Strauss noted myths were stories “that operate in men’s minds without their being aware of the fact.” Filled with symbols and not deductions, a myth can go beyond the limitations of logic and move the listener in ways dry philosophies cannot. Myths present worlds full of potential, achieving unimagined heights and plunging untold depths. Image-filled myth comes closer to presenting a full mapping of the journey than the boxed- realms depicted in the limited maps of rational reasoning.

Rarely, however, do we have access to the original telling of a myth. After multiple retellings and translations many changes leave a fractured story. Future generations are left piecing the remaining parts together like a jigsaw puzzle.  Subject to corruption over time, the archaic is eliminated. Cross-culturally, details are revised to fit the new audience. The small details that once held importance are lost or replaced with insignificant additions.

Fortunately, Dorothy’s myth is in its first version. Even with forty minutes of the original 1939 movie lost to the cutting room floor, those interested in the piecing together clues find gems within the movie’s final presentation.  The creators of the movie classic pull out all stops and fill each frame with dozens of details – too numerous to bring each to light and find significant meaning. Besides, there is also the sheer enjoyment of the film to consider. But some viewers like a good mystery as well as a fine fairy tale and enjoy combining the two genres.

Over the decades, subsequent mythic movies fill their screens with abrupt imagery as the modern hero/ine seeks resolution. Yet many cinematic epics need more than one movie to encapsulate such a journey. Movie sequels often depict the hero/ine in firm control of their primary nature. Yet as they face their final challenges, great aid is provided by figures of the opposite sex representing matured secondary traits.

Dorothy, in her fully-encapsulated myth, has not been introduced, much less received aid from the representatives of her secondary nature. She has much to accomplish. Yet with the euphoria upon entering a new wondrous land complacency sometimes emerges. Why go any further in the journey?  Isn’t this new world perception enough?  

Yet the new perception, if not taken for granted but instead questioned, often leads to a newly-awakened state. Reflected in the Munchkin’s processional song-lyrics, “Wake-up you sleepy head,” clues emerge pointing to a newly-remembered awareness joining the newborn perception. How this awareness affects the mythical journey unfolds as Dorothy enters the next chapter of her Munchkinland experience.

 

 

 

 

 



[1] The Rosary of the Philosophers: Magnum Opus Hermetic Sourcebooks No. 6 Adam McLean 1981 p124

[2] http://www.alchemywebsite.com/rosary_thumbnails.html

[3] http://www.levity.com/alchemy/rosary2.html

[4] Jung – Man and His Symbols p152

[5] Rosarium Philosphorum p4

 

Munchkinland video clips


Remember how surprised you were when the movie went from black and white (or sepia) to color?

  http://www.videosurf.com/video/the-wizard-of-oz-munchkinland-1233734340

This second video takes us into the film footage addressed in the chapter 7. How many new details can you find in this clip?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Jn8K8EA7-Q&feature=related

 * original posting 7/23/12

Philosophy of the Mystics



There is, presently, a call to rewrite the archetypal story that defines our lives. Deepok Chopra is one of the strongest proponents of this rewrite. But what if Chopra is mistaken? What if the story is correct but we- as a movement, as a society, as a civilization- are stuck in one part of the story, one groove of the record? Would it be wise to throw the entire phonograph record away simply because a scratch has brought on a stifling repetition? Or would it be wiser to remove the scratch and continue playing the masterful selection?

Likewise, perhaps spiritual seekers are simply stuck in one portion of our collective recording of conscious evolution. Perhaps seekers are stuck in the bliss-filled realm brought on by samatha meditation. As a Buddhist teacher pointed out, this samatha meditation focuses on one point, whether it’s the breath or a candle flame. And with such focusing comes the transitory state of tranquility.

But such tranquility shall pass and more disciplined focus will be necessary to continue in that state of bliss. It is a condition that is dependent on a steady adherence to a specific technique, much as an addict is dependent on a steady supply of bliss-inducing drugs.

As with any addiction, ability for sound-reasoning is impaired. So it can be seen with the addictive state brought on by the spiritual discipline of samatha meditation. The mind has become ‘refined’. Buddhist teacher, Ahjan Sumedho states in his treatise re: the 4 Noble Truths, this refinement has a major pitfall. “…being terribly refined, having a great intellect and a taste for great beauty, makes anything coarse unbearable because of the attachment to what is refined. People who have devoted their lives to refinement only find life terribly frustrating and frightening when they can no longer maintain such high standards.” http://www.amaravati.org/documents/4noble2/data/cont.html

Those well-disciplined in samatha mediation can be likened to Dorothy in her Oz adventure. She is trapped in the highest tower of a castle perched on the tallest mountain and so close to attaining the coveted broomstick from the Wicked Witch of the West (WWW). Although meditators may have reached the same heights and are close to a major spiritual goal, they can also experience despair when the bliss leaves. They may also be calling out, “I’m here in Oz, Auntie Em. I’m locked up in the witch’s castle…and I’m trying to get home to you, Auntie Em. Oh Auntie Em don’t go away! I’m frightened! Come back! Come back!”

For despite the incredible realms and experiences of such disciplines as samatha meditation, just the awareness that they are temporal, and can dissipate, brings an awareness that ’home’ is not yet found. Those so-disciplined want the peace to return, the peace they felt while in their happy, bliss-filled dream. But such a dream is meant to be transitory.

What Ahjan Sumedho claims the Buddha next taught, the meditation of acceptance, would bring the practitioner to nirvana. This acceptance meditation, vipassana meditation, could very well be the next step in bringing about a peace that has no end. The transitory peace seems to hinge on a belief the everyday, ‘coarse’ way of perceiving this realm is not a reality. Yet cannot the idea of “not reality” be a judgment that one type of perception is inferior to another? Wouldn’t this type of judgment simply lead to yet another level of frustration and fear?

Some disciplined seekers of “peace that surpasseth all understanding’, seem to get stuck in this continued cycle of labeling realms as superior (real) or inferior (illusory). There seems to be a blindness in this foundational judgment. And this judgment has been endorsed by many major religious teachings throughout the world. It is practically programmed into the religion’s followers. Even if this programming was noticed, it might still be embraced by the spiritual seeker as being a helpful judgment.

The programming seems to center upon a spiritual version of the “trickle-down effect”. It could be argued that if the seeker can maintain staying in these rarified realms, then they will be most able to truly help others. Helping others becomes a major goal in the advanced stages of conscious evolution as in earlier stages. Indeed, one of the higher stages a seeker can attain is that of a bodhisattva. It is the bodhisattva’s belief that it is best for them to postpone final enlightenment in order to help all sentient beings become free of suffering. The ‘suffering’ of others need not be a horrific nightmare-perception of one’s life. Even leading lives of ‘quiet desperation’ could be seen as suffering.

But in obtaining rarified realms and maintaining ‘the high watch’ the seeker hopes to impart their vision to others. The spiritual ego would argue that if the guard drops, if the effort to maintain the discipline that leads to these rarified realms fails, they will no longer be able to truly help others. It will be just another case of the blind leading the blind.

And so the seeker doesn’t even question that there might be a way to break free of this addiction to experiencing rarified realms. After all, a pragmatic philosophy strongly holds “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”. And actually the phonograph recording may not seem broken if it is stuck on a sensually pleasing refrain. There is no need to repair anything as the repeated refrain lulls the seeker into a wondrously bliss-filled state.

It is only by the desire to be shaken out of bliss-filled but addictive state that a person might be able to see there is much more to the recording, much more to be experienced. And that new desire comes about when the record jumps to another groove, one much more disquieting. It may seem a betrayal to all the discipline maintained over the years. After all, the happy dream is being undermined. But maybe a different version of ‘happy’ is in order. Perhaps this change could simply be a means used by Will to further the story.

The question a seeker may need to ask is whether there is enough trust in something beyond discipline. Do they trust enough to believe in something greater than discipline, something that will guide them into the next step of acceptance? It may appear as though they are being asked to turn their backs on the law and order that samatha meditation gives them. But who is to say that the depths the seeker is now being asked to experience won’t be a much more helpful means of assisting their brothers (who is, in fact and experience, the same as the seeker)? Perhaps it is time to question this trickle-down effect argument provided by the spiritual-ego, even if the argument is millennia old. This is a time for great change, as many spiritual and secular leaders have noted. Perhaps a shift in the spiritual paradigm is also needed.

The great thing about Dorothy’s story is that it provides the entire story. It goes beyond the bliss-filled realm of being on the highest castle tower perched on the tallest mountain. Dorothy’s journey does not end at that point. Instead her story continues to experiences beyond owning the much-coveted broomstick of the WWW. The story even goes beyond the rarified stratospheric realms promised in riding in The Great Oz’s hot-air balloon. Indeed, Dorothy’s journey depicts the entire map of our journey to ‘peace that surpasseth all understanding’.

The Oz celluloid story helps the evolution of consciousness on many levels. The repetition through song helps viewers ‘remember’ the blueprint of their collective journey. And the depiction of all 21 steps of the archetypal storyline gives a means of escape. For with the never-ending peace comes escape from judging the nightmare/happy dream cycle that is imbedded deep into the collective psyche. And most importantly, Dorothy’s story provides startling imagery and clue-dropping anomalies that can clearly show the best and quickest escape of the maze of non-peace.

What Dorothy’s story cannot do is give the seeker courage. Yet courage may be strengthened when learning that others have traveled a similar road and have been successful. Dorothy’s story, while inventive, is not original. It draws upon teachings, philosophies and stories from ages past. There is much to be experienced on that road. And it can be argued Dorothy is successful as she awakens to her grey Kansas bedroom. Holding her cherished dog, she exclaims, “Toto, we’re home…And I’m not going to leave here ever, ever again, because I love you all.” Such love, such acceptance – is there any goal more desirable?

So in response to the call that the time has come for a change in the archetypal story, perhaps the story, in its entirety, does not need changing. Perhaps there is a need for the seeker to take an honest assessment of where they are in the story. And perhaps it will be found that an even more courageous stance may need to be taken. Perhaps it is time to go beyond this bliss that has been the goal of so much work, for so long. Perhaps a different type of peace awaits.




* original post 5/11/12